It's not unreasonable to consider whether the Rwanda scheme, had it been deemed legal, would have worked. No asylum seekers were ever sent to Rwanda forcibly, but four individuals decided to accept the UK government's offer of £3,000 and a five year support package. Their identities cannot be disclosed by virtue of a High Court ruling which, probably reasonably, reflects normal asylum seeking practice in accordance with the Human Rights Act and the Refugee Convention.
Surely though, there would be some value in knowing what happened to them? Were they processed fairly through the Rwandan asylum system? Were they granted asylum? Were they granted residency/citizenship? Where are they now?
So much legislation is based on "here's an idea that we think might result in....". You can imagine both ministers and civil servants spending their lives with their fingers crossed. Sometimes there are pilot schemes. In a way, these four who went to Rwanda could be thought of as a pilot, so that we can learn lessons from it. We don't have to deny them their right to anonymity, and we don't want to ask subjective questions, just establish the facts as proposed above.
I'm not a journalist with sources and research teams but I tried, using various AI and search engine tools, to get some answers. But either no-one is interested or the authorities have no intention of following up. So I thought I should email the Rwandan government and the Home Office. Which I did.
Here's my email:
Can you tell me how I can get answers to the following questions about the four individuals who voluntarily went from the UK to Rwanda under the voluntary returns program? I don't want to identify the individuals, just to know:
1.Were they processed through the Rwandan asylum system?
2.Were they granted asylum?
3.Were they granted residency/citizenship?
4.Where are they now?
Thanks for your help.
I don't have high hopes of getting meaningful answers but, if I get any responses, I'll let you know.
I suppose there are other ways - Freedom of Information requests, Parliamentary questions - but I'm just some old bloke sitting on a sofa with his laptop.
Good luck with that one! Not sure if any Gvt is ever truthful, but they are probably about the same as Greenwich Council which is good at misleading, obfuscating, avoidance, and makes secretiveness its primary activity.
ReplyDeleteUpdate from the Home Office:
ReplyDeleteThank you for contacting the Home Office with your request.
This has been assigned to a caseworker (case ref FOI2025/11329). We will aim to send you a full response by 25th September 2025
Breath is bated
ReplyDeleteIf you do extract anything useful from them, please don’t give it to Farage. There are enough England flags in my town as it is. Perhaps a blog on that thorny topic? Any flags in St Austell?
ReplyDelete